Back at school. I'm getting closer and closer to prompting a chorus
in my classes when the PA announcer says "Excuse the interruption" of a
loud and hearty "NO!" It's really not okay to interrupt classes- it just
isn't. And I always audibly say NO. And some of the students are joining me.
We had a spirited discussion today about new
school rules. Kids just do not like change. Even if the change isn't
really significant in the larger sense. Boundaries and limits are a
source of comfort for kids, whether they admit it or not.
A
couple of other things caught my eye recently. First, was the
appearance of the adjectival hyphenate "soul-crushing." It's not hard to
figure out what it means, but where did that come from? Does it mean
anything that I've heard it used repeatedly in many contexts over the
past few weeks? What's going on that we seem to need this descriptor for
things that frequently?
The other thing is this- an article about the rise of what it calls "anxiety consumerism." Again, what does that say that this is a topic to be discussed.
And
speaking of hot topics, I've struggled to put a finger on sexual
harassment's place in society today, and to deal with my discomfort over
people like Louis CK returning to the scene. This article
tries to explore how men really don't get it, hard as they might try,
And maybe that's what I'm uncomfortable about- my inability to really
know what it feels like. I do agree with the writer's point that, while
people like Louis CK deserve to be able to make a living, that we should
not be feeling any pity for them if they have not done everything
possible to engage in restorative justice.
I've
generally steered clear of politics here, but it's become impossible at
this point. Like him or not, it's important that everyone understand
that what Donald Trump's actions and words mean is that he is attempting
to transition this country from a democracy (of sorts) to an
authoritarian dictatorship. For anyone who knows Trump's history (which I
have for about 40 years- I even met him in 1980), this is completely
unsurprising. I'm not disappointed or outraged by him; this is who he
is, and you can't get upset at people for being who they are- it's
pointless.
What I'm disappointed and outraged (but not
entirely surprised) by is the Republican party's willingness, eagerness
even, to embrace this antidemocratic objective. I'm not a Republican but
do most Republicans feel like the pursuit of power is more important
than democratic institutions? Do they so hate the Democratic Party that
they've grown to hate small-d democracy as well? I didn't expect them
all to just fall in line. Maybe that was naive, but this is
unprecedented.
I'm not going to catalog everything
that's been done and is being done, from so-called voter fraud measures
designed to disenfranchise who are unlikely to vote for them on down the
line. If you consume the news you know and either care or don't. But
understand that this is exactly what is going on and either like it and
go along with it or try to do something to change it.
Now
that I think about it, I don't read this as political. I read it as
existential. Does the country, the United States of America, exist as a
democracy as enumerated in the founding documents? Should it? Politics
is only part of it- the part that empowers specific people to do things.
Just because you have the power to do something doesn't mean you
should.
That said, it makes for some great comedy, doesn't it?
Wednesday, September 12, 2018
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment